Facade I Know What You Mean. These Words From Dolphus Raymond Not Only

Facade I know what you mean. These words from Dolphus Raymond not only gaveScout a surprise, but also started her first conversation with him. Through Mr. Raymond,Scout was able to see why people sometimes may act differently in front of some peoplethan they may usually behave. Before the trial, Jem explains to Scout that ever since his fiancee committedsuicide, Mr. Raymond had been drunk. However, when Scout actually meets DolphusRaymond, she finds him to be quite sober. Scout asked why he would want thetownspeople to think badly of him. Not at all offended like she expected, he answered,Itain't honest but it's mighty helpful to folks...you see they could never, never understandthat I live like I do because that's the way I want to live. Mr. Raymond explains thatpretending that he is drunk gives people a reason not to like him or his actions. Scoutbegins to see that in his own mind, Mr. Raymond is doing the town a favor by behavingunacceptably. From that point on, Scout would know t he truth behind DolphusRaymond's actions, despite the townspeople's interpretations and stories. In her brief conversation with Dolphus Raymond, Scout is able to begin seeingpast the facades people wear everyday. This lesson is one that everyone needs to learn inlife, the sooner, the better. I'm sure that Scout will realize this sometime later in life.Rodney Campbell

Free Essays on Peter Abelards “Medeival Ethics“

In Peter Abilard's "Ethical Writings", he entertains the idea that the soul may be injured. He believes the only way to injure the soul is to offend god. He calls this sin. There are different ways of sinning, among them ways where the act isn’t then considered sin at all. The two things that compose a sin are the will, and consent. When they agree, in most cases, a sin is born. For example, if a person thinks about having sex with someone else’s spouse, even if they don’t actually do it, they have committed a sin. Respectively, if that same person has sex with someone else’s spouse mistaking them for their own, there is no sin. The will must be present first in order for anything to occur. The will is the impetus for the idea (sin). Without the will (which acts on the rational part of the soul and dominates the conscious mind), there can be no consent. The non-rational part of the soul which dominates the subconscious mind then considers the idea. The subconscious either accepts or rejects what the outcome of the idea is. If the outcome is accepted, this is what we call consent. If it is rejected, there can be no sin committed because the outcome is not accepted and thus it is no longer a willful process. When this outcome is consented to, this means that a sin has been committed. To explain by using the examples above; in the first example, the will has presented the idea of having sex with another person’s spouse. The subconscious looks at the result of the action, and obviously is not opposed, so consent is granted to think about the act. In the other example, when this happens the will has not presented the idea of a sin, because the conscious mind believes this other person is someone else. The subconscious does not object to the outcome because of the false will, so consent is granted for the act, but it is not a sin because the consent was not given for the act. Through these exampl... Free Essays on Peter Abelard's â€Å"Medeival Ethicsâ€Å" Free Essays on Peter Abelard's â€Å"Medeival Ethicsâ€Å" In Peter Abilard's "Ethical Writings", he entertains the idea that the soul may be injured. He believes the only way to injure the soul is to offend god. He calls this sin. There are different ways of sinning, among them ways where the act isn’t then considered sin at all. The two things that compose a sin are the will, and consent. When they agree, in most cases, a sin is born. For example, if a person thinks about having sex with someone else’s spouse, even if they don’t actually do it, they have committed a sin. Respectively, if that same person has sex with someone else’s spouse mistaking them for their own, there is no sin. The will must be present first in order for anything to occur. The will is the impetus for the idea (sin). Without the will (which acts on the rational part of the soul and dominates the conscious mind), there can be no consent. The non-rational part of the soul which dominates the subconscious mind then considers the idea. The subconscious either accepts or rejects what the outcome of the idea is. If the outcome is accepted, this is what we call consent. If it is rejected, there can be no sin committed because the outcome is not accepted and thus it is no longer a willful process. When this outcome is consented to, this means that a sin has been committed. To explain by using the examples above; in the first example, the will has presented the idea of having sex with another person’s spouse. The subconscious looks at the result of the action, and obviously is not opposed, so consent is granted to think about the act. In the other example, when this happens the will has not presented the idea of a sin, because the conscious mind believes this other person is someone else. The subconscious does not object to the outcome because of the false will, so consent is granted for the act, but it is not a sin because the consent was not given for the act. Through these exampl...